From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!uninett.no!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: type safety in LISP Date: 09 Dec 2002 23:00:45 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3248463645669711@naggum.no> References: <3248291118131892@naggum.no> <3248375852987400@naggum.no> <3248381432222051@naggum.no> <3248417339981195@naggum.no> <3DF47D1F.9000808@web.de> <3248425589697256@naggum.no> <3DF49AD4.3020708@web.de> <3248430931911609@naggum.no> <3DF4A980.9090206@web.de> <3DF4DBFA.7050907@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1039474845 2015 129.240.65.5 (9 Dec 2002 23:00:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Dec 2002 23:00:45 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:48561 * Pascal Costanza | If Erik is capable of introducing a different terminology that is | still consistent, why doesn't he just do that? Do you think you could try to figure out just how many logical fallacies you committed in this disgusting excuse for an argument? My guess is that you are unable to think logically because you do not feel that logic can help you. You could not think your way out of a wet paper bag, could you? All emotion, no thought. *puke* | Erik's points were rather trivial to me. There is no evidence that you have actually understood any points. -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.