From ... Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed1.e.nsc.no!nsc.no!nextra.com!uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ifi.uio.no!not-for-mail From: Erik Naggum Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: array are constantp ?!?! Date: 25 Dec 2002 16:23:34 +0000 Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 24 Message-ID: <3249822214861022@naggum.no> References: <87bs3ajkkc.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: maud.ifi.uio.no 1040833415 27724 129.240.65.203 (25 Dec 2002 16:23:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@ifi.uio.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Dec 2002 16:23:35 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.lisp:49425 * Pascal Bourguignon | Did I miss something? Yes. Standards are prescriptive. You understand them, you adhere to them, /then/ have your own opinions. | What is the current status of Common-Lisp standardization? Published. | The most recent references to X3J13 date back to 1996, and most are | ten years old... Is it not wonderful? Nobody has randomly messed with the language to fit some misunderstandings or added cruft to fit some marketing scheme. Imagine a programming language that is /not/ a weapon in someone else's marketing war, but is stable and has proven useful to actual /programmers/ over a whole decade! Is it not amazing? -- Erik Naggum, Oslo, Norway Act from reason, and failure makes you rethink and study harder. Act from faith, and failure makes you blame someone and push harder.