Subject: Re: mod_lisp over CGI
From: (Rob Warnock)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:42:07 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>
Maciej Katafiasz  <> wrote:
| And I do care about speed, as I might end up handling on the
| order of 100 req/s per image.

In that case, you should really consider using the real "mod_lisp",
not "cgi_sock". The latter was never intended for loads in the
100 req/s per image range -- more like the 1-10 req/s range! ;-}
[Though I have seen it run at >100 req/s, for trivial requests.]

But "mod_lisp" has been documented[1] as running well in excess
of 1000 req/s!! So if you really care about speed...


    Marc Battyani, "Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp", 2004-10-08

Rob Warnock			<>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607