Maciej Katafiasz  <mathrick@gmail.com> wrote:
+---------------
| And I do care about speed, as I might end up handling on the
| order of 100 req/s per image.
+---------------

In that case, you should really consider using the real "mod_lisp",
not "cgi_sock". The latter was never intended for loads in the
100 req/s per image range -- more like the 1-10 req/s range! ;-}
[Though I have seen it run at >100 req/s, for trivial requests.]

But "mod_lisp" has been documented[1] as running well in excess
of 1000 req/s!! So if you really care about speed...


-Rob

[1] http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/154184cd54885460
    Marc Battyani, "Re: Thoughts on mod_lisp", 2004-10-08

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607