Subject: Re: what's the standard way to make results in the REPL "invisible"
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:58:16 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <3YqdnQfFIc9Fvg3anZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>
szergling  <senatorZergling@gmail.com> wrote:
+---------------
| Besides all the suggestions previously mentioned in this thread, I
| also use (null (expr)), which is quite quick to type in the REPL.
+---------------

NOT is even shorter!   ;-}   ;-}


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock			<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607