Subject: Re: Macros still needed with shorter LAMBDA?
From: (Rob Warnock)
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 06:32:03 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>
Russell Wallace <> wrote:
| Given that macros are needed, should they be in the same namespace
| as functions, or a different namespace?

Same, because they go in the same position (first) in a compound form.

| ...are there, for example, any situations where you'd want a function
| and macro with the same name?

Well, compiler macros. But CL already does "the right thing" in that case.


Rob Warnock			<>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607