Subject: Re: Modernizing Common Lisp
From: (Rob Warnock)
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:02:08 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>
Erann Gat  <> wrote:
| Anything sponsored by Microsoft is subject to significantly different 
| market dynamics than anything that is not sponsored by Microsoft.  
| Accordingly, VB is not a good analogy for Common Lisp.
| If MS supported Lisp we would not be having this conversation.

True. Instead, we would be having *much* more anguished conversations
than this one (probably about how Microsoft-proprietary extensions were
destroying the Common Lisp standard)...  ;-}  ;-}


Rob Warnock			<>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607