David Rush <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
| email@example.com (Brian Harvey) writes:
| > To put the above in less abstract terms: Part of the reason for the
| > success of Lisp is precisely that the Lisp programmer doesn't think
| > about what's where in memory.
| However, s/he *does need to be aware that there are things in
| memory. Despite the admirable efforts of our colleagues in the `pure'
| functional community, mutable data is here to stay (unlike the goto,
| which only continues to exist in languages with fundamentally broken
| control structures).
So... You're saying that Common Lisp has "fundamentally broken control
Rob Warnock, 31-2-510 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
SGI Network Engineering <http://reality.sgi.com/rpw3/> [until 8/15]
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy. Phone: 650-933-1673
Mountain View, CA 94043 PP-ASEL-IA
[Note: email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org aren't for humans ]