Subject: Re: responsible license
From: rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock)
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 04:23:22 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.lisp,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.shell
Message-ID: <k6ednT2qSt6XLsiiXTWc-g@speakeasy.net>
Jerry Feldman  <gaf-noSPAM@blu.org> wrote:
+---------------
| > Manufacturers would simply purchase more expensive liability
| > insurance, raise the prices on their software, and continue to produce
| > software that is no more reliable. An even worse unintended
| > consequence -- when a bug was discovered, a company would likely go
| > out of business leaving nobody and nothing to maintain the software.
| Not only that, it would destroy some commercial software vendors. Let's
| say that company a buys software from vendor b. Company a misuses that
| software, and sues company b. Even though a misused the software, they
| can end up costing company b a large amount of money just to defend
| itself. Cessna stopped producing light single engine aircraft because of
| this. not because there was anything wrong with these aircraft (They had
| never lost a suit), but because of the cost of defending themselves. 
+---------------

Piper, not Cessna. And it went bankrupt, not just "stopped producing
light singles". That's why the current successor company is called
"The NEW Piper Aircraft Company". See:

  <URL:http://www.americancapital.com/news/press_releases/pr/pr19980921.html>


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock, PP-ASEL-IA		<rpw3@rpw3.org>
627 26th Avenue			<URL:http://rpw3.org/>
San Mateo, CA 94403		(650)572-2607