> Turns out I am wrong. ACL 4.3.2 on NT is somewhat faster (and generates
> tighter code) than ACL 4.3 on Linux. The NT compiler is of later vintage
> and includes more optimizations.
So does this mean we get to draw the conclusion that Linux is just
that much more efficient than Windows?
Probably too good to be true. (Still, you have to wonder, coming from
a company whose mailer ships a megabyte of data with every email
message...)
Bob
--
Robert E. Frederking
Language Technologies Institute/Center for Machine Translation
Carnegie Mellon University
4910 Forbes Avenue Telephone: +1-412-268-6656
Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA FAX: +1-412-268-6298
Email: <cs.cmu.edu at ref> WWW: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ref/