Subject: Re: cautios question (about languages) From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: 1999/08/09 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Christopher Browne | Are you just a vulgar CLer that read anti-CL sentiment into questions | whether such sentiment was intended or not? well, I recognize _your_ intent. | When he has asked about several possible paradigms, and how CL might fit | with them, how, precisely does this represent an implication that CL must | forcibly be "reduced" to use one paradigm? because the questions asked did not indicate that the requestor understood that multiple paradigms could be supported by one language. | I think you're seeing a conspiracy of "Evil Schemers" against CL where | there isn't one. I can beat that: I _know_ you see evil intentions that aren't there. I also think you're stupid who can't see more than one way to read my anti-Scheme articles and go on to fault me for your own poor vision. #:Erik -- suppose we blasted all politicians into space. would the SETI project find even one of them?