Subject: Re: the naggum-mine claims another victim
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 12 Dec 2000 04:53:22 +0000
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Marcus G. Daniels
| We've seen how he responds to that.

  Have you, now?  And I always respond identically to all kinds of
  e-mail, presumably?  That's just too fucking nuts to believe, but it
  probably serves your personal need to work up the hostility here.

| With a single e-mail, you'll get "stop harassing me, I'll call the
| police" or he'll use it as something indefinite and inaccessible to
| exaggerate about, as in the most recent case.

  Excuse me?  What the fuck are you lying about, now?

| Then it is all the more important to point-out the objectionable
| behavior -- to make it visible.

  It doesn't work on you, who keep posting ever increasing amounts of
  destructiveness.  Just show us that it works on you first, and you
  might gain what is called "credibility".  (Look it up.)

| It is easy to keep thinking that, so long as a cost is not exposed to him.

  Yeah, you would know, as you keep thinking you are perfectly in your
  right to keep doing what _you_ do, never grasping that you aren't.
  Now, show us that you realize what you are doing, and that unknown
  concept "credibility" might gain some meaning for you.
  "When you are having a bad day and it seems like everybody is trying
   to piss you off, remember that it takes 42 muscles to produce a
   frown, but only 4 muscles to work the trigger of a good sniper rifle."
								-- Unknown