Subject: Re: source access vs dynamism
From: Erik Naggum <>
Date: 1999/09/12
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Message-ID: <>

* Raffael Cavallaro
| Well, you brought the topic up in the first place.

  "this topic" refers to working conditions to me, but to you it means
  third world starvation.  I did bring up the former, you the latter.

| I haven't dragged "people who ... accept so horrible working conditions"
| into this discussion.  You did.

  it may occur to you sometime that the context in which this was said had
  no possible connection to the third world: you brought that in from the
  outside.  I'm amazed by your lack of sense of responsibility, but will
  consider this an apology from you that you were forced to respond and
  have no will of your own when it comes to bringing up the third world,
  however completely irrelevant it is.  apology accepted, argument ignored.

  it's election time in Norway.  explains everything, doesn't it?