Subject: Re: source access vs dynamism From: Erik Naggum <email@example.com> Date: 1999/09/12 Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Raffael Cavallaro | Well, you brought the topic up in the first place. "this topic" refers to working conditions to me, but to you it means third world starvation. I did bring up the former, you the latter. | I haven't dragged "people who ... accept so horrible working conditions" | into this discussion. You did. it may occur to you sometime that the context in which this was said had no possible connection to the third world: you brought that in from the outside. I'm amazed by your lack of sense of responsibility, but will consider this an apology from you that you were forced to respond and have no will of your own when it comes to bringing up the third world, however completely irrelevant it is. apology accepted, argument ignored. #:Erik -- it's election time in Norway. explains everything, doesn't it?