2005
January
- Re: FORMAT question.
 - Re: (; comment suggestion)
 - Re: Question about backquotes
 - Re: special in cmucl
 - Re: ELisp converts to Lisp
 - Re: CLisp case sensitivity
 - Re: Smug scheme weenies?
 - Re: Special forms vs. Macros
 - Re: starting a long-lived Lisp process from a short-lived connection
 - Re: starting a long-lived Lisp process from a short-lived connection
 - Re: ELisp converts to Lisp
 - Re: Special forms vs. Macros
 - Re: Special forms vs. Macros
 - Re: ELisp converts to Lisp
 - Re: starting a long-lived Lisp process from a short-lived connection
 - Re: special declaration in clisp
 - Re: Smug scheme weenies?
 - Re: Separating evaluation and compilation environments.
 - Re: Smug scheme weenies?
 - Re: special declaration in clisp
 - Re: perl-python a-day
 - Re: Smug scheme weenies?
 - Re: Lisps' popularity
 - Re: Lisps' popularity
 - Re: a noob question
 - Re: Lisps' popularity
 - Re: Specific questions from Lisp newbie (Please don't taunt the fresh blood)
 - Re: Puzzled over loss of type information
 - Re: single keystrokes, cbreak mode
 
February
- Re: Question about lisp macros
 - Re: XCheckTypedEvent in CLX
 - Re: timer in lisp
 - Re: timer in lisp
 - Re: demonic problem descriptions
 - Re: how to call a method returned from find-method
 - Re: Noob: conditional let?
 - Re: Function tracing in CMUCL
 - Re: Please help me find a tagline that doesn't suck
 - Re: When CANNOT use 'first'/'rest' in place of 'car'/'cdr'?
 - Re: An idea for making define-macro more convenient to use
 
March
- Re: Wanted: Magic Lisp snippets
 - Re: Wanted: Magic Lisp snippets
 - Re: A list 'explode" function
 - Re: Lisp fragmentation (was Re: Python becoming less Lisp-like)
 - Re: automating ffi? what would it take?....
 - Re: Tim Bray's Mind
 - Re: Tim Bray's Mind
 - Re: Tim Bray's Mind
 - Re: How powerful macros are?
 - Re: How powerful macros are?
 - Re: Tim Bray's Mind
 - Re: URGENT help with project
 - Re: URGENT help with project
 - Re: generating a new symbol from existing one
 
April
- Re: Considering Lisp for project but not sure if it fits
 - Re: Abuse of defvar??
 - Re: Abuse of defvar??
 - Re: Considering Lisp for project but not sure if it fits
 - Re: cmucl problem: Condition slot is not bound: CONDITIONS::FORMAT-CONTROL
 - Re: web authoring tools
 - Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
 - Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
 - Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
 - Re: Guy Steele interview in DDJ
 - Re: OT: geometrical algorithm design
 - Re: format to nil?
 - Re: "Higher Order Perl" book and Lisp
 - Re: Lisp success stories
 - Re: Lisp success stories
 - Re: ASDF question
 - Re: Web applications and threading
 - Re: format to nil?
 - Re: ASDF question
 - Re: can anyone offer Lisp job?
 - Re: obstack
 - Re: can anyone offer Lisp job?
 - Re: meaning of OP
 - Re: Lisp Optimised Workstation
 - Re: Web services in CL
 - Re: An ode to Erlang
 - Re: Lisp Optimised Workstation
 - Re: LISP
 - Re: Lisp on AMD 64
 - Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
 - Re: Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
 - Re: Why is Lisp not as popular as Python?
 - Re: Object persistence (like Pickle in Python)
 - Re: timer in cmucl?
 - Re: An ode to Erlang
 
May
- Re: ANSI question (load evaluation order)
 - Re: CLOS block compilation type checking
 - Re: CLOS block compilation type checking
 - Re: Question about PG's ACL
 - Re: CLOS block compilation type checking
 - Re: CLOS block compilation type checking
 - Re: reading backquote expressions
 - Re: Wondering if you guys would like to comment on this
 - Re: Critique my code: using Lisp to parse lots of "ps -elf" files in AIX
 - Re: anamorphic macros
 - Re: Changing source on the fly
 - Re: Iterating over general sequences
 - Re: a Dijkstra quote (what lang?)
 - Re: Deploying Common Lisp applications
 - Re: Help with macro to list structure properties?
 - Re: How can this macro be improved?
 - Re: HTML reader macro
 - Re: Deploying Common Lisp applications
 - Re: HTML reader macro
 - Re: HTML reader macro
 - Re: Infinite precision floating-point
 - Re: CliniSys
 
June
- Re: Portable AllegroServe + Clisp
 - Re: sxhash redux
 - Re: Unquote
 - Re: Ugly loop
 - Re: Lisp and Web Programming
 - Re: Maphash into a new hashtable
 - Re: I've thought better of Linux
 - Re: I've thought better of Linux
 - Re: Comments, questions, gripes, or rants about the ALU?
 - Re: Running CMUCL without the REPL?
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: Buying a MacIvory
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: de threadibus [was: ILC2005...]
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: ILC 2005 Proceedings Available
 - Re: de threadibus
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 
July
- Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: Source for LOOP macro
 - Re: Status of SBCL on Windows
 - Re: DrScheme & sgl
 - Re: Status of SBCL on Windows
 - Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
 - Re: `let*' and functional design
 - Re: How much should I charge for fixed-price software contract?
 - Re: `let*' and functional design
 - Re: Writing shared libraries using Lisp
 - Re: Writing shared libraries using Lisp
 - Re: a working lisp telnetd?
 - Re: How do you imagine future Common Lisp standard ?
 - Re: a working lisp telnetd?
 - Re: Beyond CL?
 - Re: a working lisp telnetd?
 - Re: delete-file & probe-file on directories
 - Re: delete-file & probe-file on directories
 - Re: delete-file & probe-file on directories
 - Re: Writing shared libraries using Lisp
 - Re: matrix implementation considerations
 - Re: professional package use?
 - Re: Rather useful unix utility
 
August
- Re: High Resolution Timing
 - Re: High Resolution Timing
 - Re: Cross Platform Distribution Library
 - Re: [OT] can anyone offer Lisp job?
 - Re: Newbie: Emacs Advice
 - Re: arrow keys in sbcl or cmucl interpreter
 - Re: Newbie style questions
 - Re: EDIF what happened to it?
 - Re: Beyond CL?
 - Re: "attributes" in S-expressions
 - Re: How much should I charge for fixed-price software contract?
 - Re: How much should I charge for fixed-price software contract?
 - Re: learning lisp by doing
 - Re: Beyond CL?
 - Re: lists of lists (newbie)
 - Re: learning lisp by doing
 - Re: Hypercube in lisp (newbie)
 - Re: Hypercube in lisp (newbie)
 - Re: Big time difference between (unix) find and DIRECTORY : why?
 - Re: Hypercube in lisp (newbie)
 - Re: Not debugging? (was: How much should I charge for fixed-price ...)
 - Re: Simulation: Changes of opinion (a little less newbie...)
 - Re: Hypercube in lisp (newbie)
 - Re: How can I make this function simplier?
 - Re: SLIME and XEmacs
 - Re: Windows PCL Lispbox now available
 - Re: list searching
 - Re: Can not find older posting: Reading files (fast)
 - Re: Windows PCL Lispbox now available
 - Re: Windows PCL Lispbox now available
 - Re: Can not find older posting: Reading files (fast)
 - Re: Can not find older posting: Reading files (fast)
 - Re: Can not find older posting: Reading files (fast)
 - Re: novice: mapcan use?
 - Re: How do you imagine future Common Lisp standard ?
 - Re: discrete event simulator
 
September
- Re: novice: mapcan use?
 - Re: De-facto standard CL implementation of continuations?
 - Re: De-facto standard CL implementation of continuations?
 - Re: (warn) isn't doing what I expect it to
 - Re: vector to string conversion
 - Re: De-facto standard CL implementation of continuations?
 - Re: novice: mapcan use?
 - Re: (warn) isn't doing what I expect it to
 - Re: Where does the drive to syntax come from?
 - Re: My Perl is starting to look like Lisp
 - Re: Where does the drive to syntax come from?
 - Re: Where does the drive to syntax come from?
 - Re: Where does the drive to syntax come from?
 - Re: nested backquote and cmucl
 - Re: Long running lisp jobs. Re: Lisp: 4th Most Frequently Used
 - Re: Long running lisp jobs. Re: Lisp: 4th Most Frequently Used
 - Re: Structure interdependent slots? (newbie)
 - Re: Piping shell commands in clisp
 - Re: Common Lisp flet
 - Re: What's so great about lisp?
 - Re: saving image with cmucl (for portable allegroserve app)
 - Re: saving image with cmucl (for portable allegroserve app)
 - Re: What's so great about lisp?
 
October
- Re: The limits of lisps synatactic gymnastics? (i sure hope not)
 - Re: newbee question
 - Re: newbee question
 - Re: newbee question
 - Re: setf and push behave differently with symbol macro
 - Re: Could you have a look at my code (arithmetical stuff) ?
 - Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
 - Re: Chess in 458 Lines
 - Re: Head's Up!*
 - Re: Two questions together
 - Re: Head's Up!*
 - Re: Head's Up!*
 - Re: "Converted" messages
 - Re: simple question
 - Re: "t" stands for the type true and for the boolean expression true ..
 - Re: simple question
 - Re: simple question
 - Re: Still clinking to Java?
 - Re: "t" stands for the type true and for the boolean expression true ..
 - Re: "t" stands for the type true and for the boolean expression true ..
 - Re: Newbie with some GUI questions
 - Re: Still clinking to Java?
 - Re: Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally: Prefix vs Infix Math Notation
 - Re: Eval performance
 - Re: Lispnik logo (was Re: Lisp Logo Madness!)
 
November
- Re: Timing for various operations on a PC
 - Re: Why do Python, Java and Perl have so many libraries and CL does not?
 - Re: Compiler warnings
 - Re: Newbie question - talking with lisp
 - Re: Newbie question - talking with lisp
 - Re: Cells under Lispworks
 - Re: CL Performance/Syntax of IF-THEN-ELSE
 - Re: Cells under Lispworks
 - Re: OT: Geometrical Algorithm Design - Addendum
 - Re: Compact multiple-value returns
 - Re: Etiquette Question
 - Re: Scoping Question
 - Re: ASDF woes
 - Re: Scoping Question
 - Re: Lisp for MS Windows?
 - Re: newbe: documentation string length
 - Re: To be or not to be: the way of Lisp
 - Re: Collecting nested lists in Loop
 - Re: sxhash and object identity
 - Re: History of Comment Style & Names
 - Re: CL idiom for Scheme's named let
 - Re: CL idiom for Scheme's named let
 - Re: silly: "spel" instead of "macro"
 - Re: Super Mario 64 & Lisp
 - Re: SeaFunc meets Nov. 29th
 
December
- Re: Is Lisp ready to become popular?
 - Re: Reddit Guys on the Pros and Cons of Lisp
 - Re: Style question
 - Re: Style question
 - Re: Style question
 - Re: Handling errors in standard output statements with openmcl
 - Re: Reddit rewritten in Python
 - Re: Reddit rewritten in Python
 - Re: Reddit rewritten in Python
 - Re: Style question
 - Re: Handling errors in standard output statements with openmcl (learner questions)
 - Re: Is Greenspun enough?
 - Re: Is Greenspun enough?
 - Re: Link-it: The nextgen reddit written in Common Lisp is online
 - Re: Is Greenspun enough?
 - Re: Is Greenspun enough?
 - Re: Is Greenspun enough?
 - Re: CLX/CMUCL: warning on load
 - Re: What compiler to study?
 - Re: macro code review!!
 - Re: Is Lisp ready to become popular?
 - Re: macro code review!!
 - Re: Is Lisp ready to become popular?
 - Re: SBCL on FreeBSD (was: Re: Reddit rewritten in Python)
 - Re: "telnet clx", "portable CLX", and the various Lisps
 - Re: "telnet clx", "portable CLX", and the various Lisps
 - Re: "telent clx", "portable CLX", and the various Lisps
 - Re: MUSING: standard bodies vs benevolent dictators, popularity
 - Re: Code review: CL for SNA (Social Network Analysis)
 - Re: Code review: CL for SNA (Social Network Analysis)
 - Re: Do I have to be an expert to get performance: CL versus Perl
 - Re: conciseness is power
 - Re: Arrays and LET
 - Re: something i don't understand...
 - Re: Arrays and LET
 - Re: Python and Lisp Test
 - Re: Python and Lisp Test